My Salute To Bloggers.

My Salute To Bloggers.

Those of us blogging know why we blog and why the topics we write about are important to us. We each bring something to the table that is truly of benefit. We believe that you our readers will be interested as well. Why would any of us be interested? BECAUSE! The writings of Interestingliterature’s blog bring about that [ Aha! ] moment as well as joy. Or they educate and give better insight into our body’s workings which many of us have been looking for as Extolerant’s blogs do. They help us to be more atuned to our bodies and the things we put into them as Blossoming Wellness’ blog conveys. We show that even after serious illness that we can be and should be quite pro active personally in creating an environment more conducive to our body’s well being, naturally. Inverness, accomplishes that through her blogs. Then there is the BunnyandPorkBelly’s blog of scintillating pictures of great looking foods and her tastebud critiques that sometimes leaves one salivating. Let me not forget physicians like Dr. Pouya Shafipour and his staff. [ I purposely used the term physician as opposed to doctor here because — physician comes from an ancient Greek noun φύσις (physis) and its derived adjective physikos, meaning “nature” and “natural] (1) He and his staff work tirelessly towards preventative means primarily using holistic means of aiding our bodies. They express their works through their Wellesley Medical blog. Add to this a burgeoning artist blog ( Katy Jade Dobson Art ) who draws you into her artwork with each stroke somehow getting that work to jump off the canvas at its viewer. Lastly, but not least there is Adventures, Aspirations and Aha Moments blog who lets us into her world on a personal level that each of us can find something we can identify with.

There are tons of other blogs out there probably doing or trying to do the same thing for this public forum is huge. What used to be a local forum is now a global one. Some of these blogs require ethical responsibilty because their information can benefit or not benefit the body beautiful. Others require no such responsibility. But they bring positives in some form or another. Each of these blogs that I am familiar with and admire continually amaze me with their content and their abilities to pull me in with “Aha” moments as Cathy Laws says. As for myself, each keystroke’s intent is to deliver informative, interesting, productive and sometimes fun content while at the same time bringing an ethical responsibility to get the word out. What I blog about truly delivers benefits on top of benefits improving the quality of people’s lives. Though I am not a doctor I take to heart the intent of their oathes or promises …. “First, do no harm” ( Primum non nocere in Latin).

Changing not only the way you think, but the actions you take. Here’s to your health.
Chipsterhealth, August 28, 2013

WATCH and LISTEN to Juana talk about how this Cieaura’s PureRelief “chip” helped her.”

NOTE: Use Your Earbuds! You Do Not Want To Miss A Word Of What Juana Is Saying!

Cieaura products do not diagnose, cure, mitigate treatment or prevent disease or any other medical condition.

Content published here is not read or approved by CieAura before it is posted and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CieAura.


(1) English etymology:


Afraid Of Needles, Are You?

Afraid Of Needles, Are You? Apparently you have plenty of company. You just might find that this is what you have been looking for. You owe it to yourself to read on.

Needles as applied in Western medicine are used for various reasons. Two of those reasons are either extract something from or inject something into our bodies. In the case of injection usually some type of drug enters our bodies. Examples of these are child birthing women having epidurals, needles poked into their spines with an anesthesia or athletes having cortisone and steroid injections in their knees and other parts of their bodies. In each of these examples the primary reason that needles are still used is for expediency to diminish or eliminate pain or improve healing or performance. An added benefit is that the insertion of that needle is usually much more targeted and localized.


In Eastern medicine TCM ( Traditional Chinese Medicine ) which is also known as acupuncture multitutudes of needles are used. There is a major difference here though. Only the needle or needles are entering our body minus any drug. The idea is to influence our bodies energy (Qi) and their pathways (meridians) to bring our bodies into a balanced state thereby allowing the body to help itself, naturally. However, this approach too can bring anxiety because a needle is used or multitudes of needles are used. These might make us look like a porcupine or the character Pinhead from the movie Hellraiser which does not help our anxieties. (1)



Yet, needles to date (2013) are still the modus operandi of administering medication to help with pain, healing and performance of various types or of affecting Qi ( chee). Irrespective of extracting or injecting, I am the first to tell you that I do not know what causes the fear of a needle or needles. But, that fear does exist and could be preventing you or someone whom you know from getting relief from their pain, needed performance ( better energy ), or the ability to heal better.

Is there currently a way in 2013 to assuage that fear of ours besides psychiatry? Is there a highly effective means not involving NEEDLES of any type as well as NOT employing DRUGS of any type as in western medicine here now? Does a highly effective approach like acupuncture but WITHOUT NEEDLES exists NOW that influences the body as in TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) which can bring the body into balance to such a degree that it can assist itself to better itself? AND, WHATEVER this thing is can it actually help with discomfort bringing relief from pain or allergies, improving energy, allowing for better sleep, or even help with discomfort due to hormonal imbalances that can bring about hot flashes?

Hmmm. The answer is a RESOUNDING YES, to all of the questions above!


• NO SIDE – EFFECTS ( non-transdermal, meaning nothing enters the body)

Changing not only the way you think, but the actions you take. Here’s to your health.
Chipsterhealth, August 23, 2013

READ more about Cieaura’s approach to ridding you of your FEAR of NEEDLES.

You DON’T have time to read then LISTEN HERE:


WATCH and LISTEN to talk how Cieaura’s needles-less acupuncture [ PURE RELIEF Holographic Chips ] helped her.

NOTE: Use Your Earbuds! You Do Not Want To Miss A Word Of What Michelle Is Saying.

MORE testimonials are available on my YouTube Channel, Chipsterhealth.

Cieaura products do not diagnose, cure, mitigate treatment or prevent disease or any other medical condition.

Content published here is not read or approved by CieAura before it is posted and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CieAura.

(1) Pinhead from the movie Hellraiser

Love your Lymph

Just a well written, informative and eye opening blog. Thank you.


Love your Lymph

I didn’t have a clue what a lymphatic system was until I was 21 years old when I learnt that mine was riddled with cancer.  Even then, I still didn’t understand this complex system fully.

Now that I am devoting my time to healing my lymphatic system, I have had to really learn to understand it and love it.

The lymphatic system is made up of lymph vessels, lymph nodes, lymph fluid, the tonsils, adenoids, the thymus and spleen and is a component of the circulatory system.

It is the best cleansing system we’ve got.  Whenever toxins or bacteria enter tissues within our body our lymphatic system picks them up, traps them in our lymph nodes and kills them with white blood cells.  You may have noticed that when you have a cold or infection your glands are swollen, these are your lymph nodes hard at work.

View original post 616 more words

Are You Open To Beneficial Change That Is Nothing To Sneeze At?

Are you open to beneficial change that is nothing to sneeze at? You do not have to answer yet.

Allergies for many of us are nothing to sneeze at. ( Is there a pun in there somewhere? ). When we experience Sinus-ītis or Rhinosinusītis, histamines our bodies communicators, protectors, regulators and informants have been given their marching orders. They cause our bodies to respond to invading organisms that try to infect or actually infect our bodies. That is the good news. The not so good news is that they are also responsible for the discomfort of sneezing, runny nose, tearing eyes, etcetera associated with the [ ītis ] part of Sinus. It is this discomfort and how each of us responds to it that is the NOTHING TO SNEEZE about part. Sometimes we may even look like a baseball catcher giving signals to the pitcher as we pull out the Kleenex, rub our eyes, blow our noses, breathe through our mouths and itch and scratch trying to get relief.


So what is a fellow or fella ( female ) to do? Well for starters let me state what I USED to do and what way too many of you are still doing — that is “DOING” the ANTIHISTIMINE, DECONGESTANT or some combination “THING” to inhibit the the discomfort associated with the particular inflammation caused by our very own histamines. There are at least 54 different drugs that (us) allergy sufferers take! (1) We all know these drugs by there marketing names however here are just a few of those 54 technical names; Bropheniramine, diphenhydramines, loratadines, chlorpheniramines, pseudoephedrine and oxymetazoline for starters. No, they are not some obscure ancient names from the Illiad and The Odessey. Do they help? Yes, BUT….two words SIDE-EFFECTS. There are so many of them that most of us ignore them. For those of us who it is important to us requires that we write them down or have a damn good memory. Try your hand at it. READ BELOW.

DECONGESTANTS, (Bropheniramine, diphenhydramines medications USED for the temporary relief of nasal congestion due to the colds, hay fever, and sinus congestion can cause nervousness • restlessness • excitability • dizziness • headache • fear • anxiety • tremors • hallucinations • allergic reaction • hives • difficulty breathing • pounding fast or uneven heartbeat • bruising or bleeding • unusual weakness • fever • chills • body aches • flu symptoms • dangerously high blood pressure • blurred vision • ringing in your ears • confusion • chest pain • uneven heart rate • convulsions (seizures) • loss of appetiten • swelling of your face, lips, tongue, or throat. Additionally, Pseudo-ephedrine MAY have adverse effects on the FETUS and is excreted in BREAST MILK. HOW MANY DOTS DID YOU COUNT BEFORE YOU STOPPED COUNTING?
DOSAGE: Take one each 12 hours.

ANTIHISTAMINES – (Triprolidine, Fexofenadine, Diphenhydramine, Loratidine) medication USED for the temporary relief of nasal congestion due dust, pollen, animals can cause Dry mouth • Drowsiness • Dizziness • Nausea and vomiting • Restlessness or moodiness (in some children) • trouble urinating or not being able to urinate • blurred vision • Confusion. Don’t take it during the day, before driving or operating heavy machinery. There is even some speculation antihistamines may contribute to or worsen Alzheimer’s symptoms. And it is known that these can adversely interact with other drugs. (2)
DOSAGE: Take a pill or two each 4 – 6 hours for some others for 12 – 24 hours.
TALK to your doctor first if you have an enlarged prostate, heart disease, high blood pressure, thyroid problems, kidney or liver disease, a bladder obstruction, or glaucoma. (3). STILL COUNTING DOTS?

ANTIBIOTICS – common to these products are: A bad taste in the mouth • Upset stomach • Mild to severe diarrhea • vaginal yeast infection • inflammation or infection of the small or large intestine (enterocolitis). HAVE YOU CONNECTED THE DOTS YET?

So getting back to THE question – Are You Open To Beneficial Change That Is Nothing To Sneeze At?
If NO, you can STOP right here. BUT IF YES CONTINUE…..

CieAura OFFERS Sinus Allergy sufferers an alternative that is much much easier to COUNT the DOTS.
DOSAGE: NONE. ( non-transdermal )
• WHAT TO DO: Wear one behind one or both ears for up to 5 days.

Changing not only the way you think but the actions you take. Here’s to your health.
Chipsterhealth, August 18, 2013

READ more about Cieaura’s approach to energy wellness.

You DON’T have time to read then LISTEN HERE:


WATCH and LISTEN to Palma talk about how this SINUS ALLERGY “chip” helped her.”

NOTE: Use Your Earbuds! You Do Not Want To Miss A Word Of What Palma Is Saying.

MORE testimonials are available on my YouTube Channel, Chipsterhealth.


Cieaura products do not diagnose, cure, mitigate treatment or prevent disease or any other medical condition.

Content published here is not read or approved by CieAura before it is posted and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CieAura.


(2) What Are Histamines And Why Do We Need Them? James K. Wilson

(3) Web MD – Antihistamines For Allergies

Cell Phones: Are You Putting Your Child At Risk?


The ancient Mayans smoked tobacco. The first European settlers smoked tobacco and the ancestors of these first European settlers continued the practice into the settling of what was to become the United States. But none of the people of those time periods smoked it on a daily basis or in quantities sufficient enough to be either aware of its dangers or to actually be dangerous. Fast forward to the late 1800s where the ability to mass produce tobacco took place. Now it became big. Then by the mid 20th century it became really big business to the tune of more than 100 billion cigarettes being produced annually. By now the world population was “hooked”. But something else was happening at the same time. An increase in the incidents of lung cancers directly related to smoking was discovered by British researchers in the 1940s. This resulted in the push for public awareness from which a battle would ensue that would take on almost epic proportions as in the classic battle of David and Goliath. The Tobacco Industry was going to make every effort to prevent that from happening, so they thought. A better educated public would be better able to eliminate or at least reduce this very real health danger. The result of this information at best would put them out of business and at least might diminish their profits. Either way the Tobacco Industry was not going to have any of this. We the people were David, supposedly with no lobby, no money, little knowledge, no power became the thorn in the foot of the Goliath and we made it stumble. But it took time. This Goliath had millions, lobbyist, inside knowledge and tremendous political power. But, through dissemination of pertinent information, perseverance, becoming more informed, legislation began to be enacted to do just that. Legislation with HEALTH WARNINGS began being put on cigarette packages. First it was, “Cigarettes maybe harmful to your health” to “Cigarettes cause cancer, heart disease, emphysema and may complicate pregnancy.

There was success but it took time. A lot of time. The public was very slow to respond. There were a number of things that contributed to that. The obvious was that people supposedly enjoyed smoking or they thought they needed to. It was “cool”. The public did not really know that they were addicted. (Though addiction was a known component, it was vigorously denied by the tobacco industry.) The influence of the media and their campaigns through advertisements, TV and movies had tremendous impact. Add to this that there were no immediate detrimental affects to individuals. (One could see the affects that breathing smoke did to our lungs on a more immediate basis either by looking what it did to a white handkerchief or at x-rays of a smoker’s lungs. ) Because the affects of tobacco smoking or inhaling as in second hand smoke is cumulative, the devastating affects of cancer, heart disease and emphysema usually only rear their ugly heads much later in a person’s life. It took many years for the public to positively respond with actions that would benefit the individual and the masses from a health standpoint. Keeping these points in mind let’s move into the latter quarter of the 20th century and into the beginning of 21st century.

I opened up this blog with this encapsulated history of the tobacco industry because by now it is a familiar one for many people. A similar story is unfolding today on multiple fronts. I am concentrating on the cell phone industry though and that of radio frequencies (EMF) as they pertain to cell phone usage and the potential harm they maybe doing to us all but, especially our CHILDREN. There are a lot of parallels taking place right this moment in this industry much like that which occurred within the tobacco industry. (No, as far as I know the Mayans were not using cell phones.) This may not be a familiar story to you yet, but it will be soon.

The wireless phone idea goes as far back as 1918 or slightly before that period. Its actual implementation came around the 1940s and 1950s but they were known as MOBILE phones. They were huge and cumbersome by today’s standards. These early products were hindered by their high cost and the technology of the day. To give you a better picture of what that might have been like, take 5000 to 40,000 people waiting to get on the 405 freeway in Los Angeles, 2013. ( actually we could even use the Pasadena Freeway of the 1940s and 50s) Now let’s say that those 5000 to 40,000 people could only get on or off either freeway at a very few selected on-ramps at a rate of approximately 3 every 30 minutes. Then those waiting had to wait until another group of 3 got off before they could get on. This is over simplified but I think that you get the idea.

The number of people using these mobile devices was minuscule until the last quarter of the 20th century. Until the latter part of that century they used them sporadically. People then DID NOT keep them to their ears for any real length of time nor CARRY them around on their persons in bras and in pockets. It was not until 1973 that the first true cell phone was developed by Martin Cooper. That device was still too big and expensive to be used by the general public though the bottle neck of 3 calls every 30 minutes had been eclipsed by a wide margin by 1973 there was still a ways to go to truly have high transmission traffic. That would change though at an unprecedented accelerated rate. The cell phone shrunk, the technology vastly improved, the transmission of data became much more efficient, and the phones became more affordable. 1% of the US population used cell phones in 1985. 10 years later that number jumped to a little more than 10%. 2005, another 10 years 75% of the US population had a cell phone! Explosive growth? You bet you. The next 5 years, 2010 100% plus U.S. saturation. (1) By 2012 there are virtually as many cell phones as their are people on the planet. (2) Heck, there maybe more cell phones than toilets.

So, what is the crux of this blog, are you putting your children at risk? Glad you asked.

Just as with smoking, it took a large enough population of smokers with a subset of affected smokers experiencing serious health issues to begin questioning if there was some correlation between the product and the effects of the product. And as was suggested earlier, the fact that such health issues did not occur immediately nor at any significant levels and were cumulative over time, resulted in slow responses. Besides the tobacco industry had the world already hooked making it more difficult for many to make a drastic or dramatic change. For us humans to make an immediate change the problem has to be one of imminent danger. And the effects of smoking were, well in the future and not everyone would be affected.

This same scenario in 2013 applies to the cell phone industry with its cell phone/smart phones. The whole world is now “hooked” on being in touch with each other through the use of these devices. Though admittedly there are definite benefits to having instant communication, Other than ESP (which is such a some time proposition so far) we all now have the ability to stay in touch with virtually any person on the planet, 24/7! And as it turns out there is another push for public awareness as to the possible health concerns for all of us. (Health notices are beginning to show up on cell phone lately) The battle is just beginning. It centers around the highly probable effects of EMF (Electro Magnetic Fields) upon our cells and DNA. There is research popping up globally that there is a higher risk of developing various types of cancers conditional upon how long we use these devices, the signal strength of these devices (or lack thereof), and the places where we either store them and use them on our persons. Many of you already know where you put your phone, women your bras, men and women your pockets. We put the phones to our ears to talk over extensive periods of time. In each of these cases two things are working against us, the length of time on our persons and the strength of or lack of strength of RF (radio frequency signals). There is even speculation that there maybe a correlation between children’s behavioral issues deriving from prolonged exposure of the fetus while in the womb. Other studies are pointing to possible increased neurological problems such as headaches, dizziness and more. Is it conclusive? Not yet. But, these issues were not even on the radar 40 years ago. Just as the effects of smoking was not initially either.

For now, the emphasis here are the topics relating to CHILDREN because they are at the greatest risk. Reports and studies surfacing globally are attempting to give the public pertinent information in this regard that RF frequencies penetrate farther into a child’s brain because of physiological reasons which the diagram below shows.


(A) Children absorb more energy than adults from the same phone.
(B) Tumors in mid-brain are more deadly than those in the temporal lobe.
(C) Children’s cells are producing more quickly than adults.
(D) Children’s immune system is not as well developed as adults.
(E) Longer potential for life time exposure for children than adults.

Pregnant women would also be wise to avoid cell phones as much as possible. In 2008, researchers analyzed data from nearly 13,000 children and found that exposure to cell phones while in the womb, and also during childhood, were linked to behavioral difficulties. Using handsets just two or three times a day during pregnancy was enough to raise the risk of their babies developing hyperactivity and difficulties with conduct, emotions, and relationships by the time they reached school age — and the risk became even greater if the children also used the phones themselves before the age of seven. (4)

Doctors are seeing an increase in these areas listed below.

• parotid gland tumors
• brain tumors
• non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
• leukemia
• eye cancer
• salivary gland tumors

What you have seen above or are about to read below should not be taken lightly as if it were Ripley’s Believe It Or Not.

‘… it is more prudent to take seriously the reports by multiple investigators that radiofrequency can damage DNA and increase the risk for brain tumors, and for industry-independent agencies to provide needed funding for detailed research to ascertain the molecular basis for such effects.” Dr. Ronald B. Herberman suggests this as “the precautionary principle”.

• Ronald B. Herberman, MD, Director Emeritus of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (3)


“Science has shown increased risk of brain tumors from use of cell phones, as well as increased risk of eye cancer, salivary gland tumors, testicular cancer, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and leukemia.”

• Lloyd Morgan, lead author and member of the Bioelectromagnetics Society.

“The scientific data show, with a high degree of confidence, that mobile phone exposure is associated with an increased brain tumor risk.

“The age group below 20 years is facing the greatest risk, which for malignant (deadly) brain tumors is about 400 percent, compared to non-exposed.”
‘….some of the industry’s own research found that cell phones caused brain tumors, and subsequent industry-funded studies from 2000 to 2002 also showed an elevated risk of brain cancer.”

“One such study reportedly found a 20 percent increased risk of brain tumor for every year of cell phone use!”

• Dr. Gerd Oberfeld, M.D., the Speaker for
 Environmental Medicine for the Austrian Medical Association in Vienna. (3)

In 2005, the British-based National Radiological Protection Board suggested children younger than age 8 should not be given a cell phone as it risks exposing their young bodies to harmful radiation.
Last year Toronto’s department of public health followed suit, warning that because of possible side effects from radio frequency radiation, children under 8 should only use a cell phone in emergencies, and teenagers should limit calls to less than 10 minutes. (3)

Few people realize this, but brain cancer has surpassed leukemia as the number one cancer killer in children, and many scientists believe this is directly linked to the exponential increase in cell phone use and other wireless devices.(3)

Australia has seen an increase in pediatric brain cancers of 21 percent in just one decade. This is consistent with studies showing a 40 percent brain tumor increase across the board in Europe and the U.K. over the last 20 years. (3)

Experts Adamantly Claim Harmful Effects are Now Provable

Experts in the area of the biological effects of electromagnetic frequencies (EMF) and wireless technologies believe there’s virtually no doubt that cell phones and related gadgets are capable of causing not only cancer but contributing to a wide variety of other conditions, from depression and diabetes to heart irregularities and impaired fertility. Researchers have now identified numerous mechanisms of harm, which explain how electromagnetic fields impact your cells and damages your DNA. (4)

Dr. Devra Davis, author of “Disconnect – The Truth About Cellphone Radiation,” has been researching the safety hazards of radiation emanating from your cell phone. Like many people, Dr. Davis just didn’t believe the possibility of cell phones being dangerous―until she studied it. And now, with the toxicological and epidemiological evidence to back up her claims, she’s trying to get the word out that cell phone radiation is not only dangerous, but can be downright lethal.(4)

‘…. Your cell phone is not necessarily a safe device,’

“The other thing to be aware of is that we haven’t had any good studies in the pediatric population. A child’s skull is much thinner. The scalp is much thinner. And the amount of radiation that goes into the pediatric brain is much higher than in the adult. So, we should be cautious with how we allow our children to use a cell phone. They’re going to be the ones not only using it at a much younger age, but using it over a much longer duration. (5)

‘But what’s important to recognize is that, if you do develop BRAIN CANCER, it’s one of the most DEVASTING illnesses that you can have. So, if you WANT to take PRECAUTIONS, at least you’re aware that your cell phone is not NECCESARILY a SAFE DEVICE, ’

• Dr. Keith Black, Keith L. Black, Chairman of the Department of Neurosurgery at Cedar Sinai Hospital is an internationally renowned neurosurgeon and scientist.

So, are you able to answer the question, are you putting your child at risk?

I hope that I have gotten you to seriously delve into the information here. This is one of those times that it will be good to talk to oneself and come up with a satisfactory reply.

READ more about Cieaura’s approach to protecting your children and you from cell phone EMF. START HERE:

You DON’T have time to read then go HERE:

Changing not only the way you think but the actions you take. Here’s to your health.
Chipsterhealth, Aug. 08, 2013



Cieaura products do not diagnose, cure, mitigate treatment or prevent disease or any other medical condition.

Content published here is not read or approved by CieAura before it is posted and does not necessarily represent the views and opinions of CieAura.

(1) Wikipedia
History of Mobile Phones – Early services – 0G

(2) Huff ington Post – Per the United Nations telecom agency.

(3) Dr. Mercola article

(4) Dr. Mercola article

(5) Dr. Keith Black